banner



Home  ›  What Animals Can You See At Sunset Savanna

What Animals Can You See At Sunset Savanna

Written By Saturday, May 28, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Terrestrial locomotion using ii limbs

An ostrich, the fastest extant biped[one] at 70 km/h (43 mph)[2] [note 1]

Bipedalism is a form of terrestrial locomotion where an organism moves by ways of its two rear limbs or legs. An beast or machine that usually moves in a bipedal manner is known every bit a biped , meaning 'two feet' (from Latin bis 'double' and foot 'foot'). Types of bipedal movement include walking, running, and hopping.

Few modern species are habitual bipeds whose normal method of locomotion is two-legged. In the Triassic period some groups of archosaurs (a grouping that includes crocodiles and dinosaurs) developed bipedalism; amidst the dinosaurs, all the early forms and many later groups were habitual or sectional bipeds; the birds are members of a clade of exclusively bipedal dinosaurs, the theropods. Inside mammals, habitual bipedalism has evolved multiple times, with the macropods, kangaroo rats and mice, springhare,[iv] hopping mice, pangolins and hominin apes (australopithecines and humans) as well as various other extinct groups evolving the trait independently. A larger number of modern species intermittently or briefly utilise a bipedal gait. Several lizard species move bipedally when running, ordinarily to escape from threats. Many primate and bear species will prefer a bipedal gait in society to reach food or explore their environment, though there are a few cases where they walk on their hind limbs only. Several arboreal primate species, such equally gibbons and indriids, exclusively walk on two legs during the cursory periods they spend on the ground. Many animals rear up on their hind legs while fighting or copulating. Some animals commonly stand on their hind legs to reach nutrient, continue picket, threaten a competitor or predator, or pose in courting, but do not motility bipedally.

Etymology [edit]

The word is derived from the Latin words bi(southward) 'two' and ped- 'foot', every bit contrasted with quadruped 'four feet'.

Advantages [edit]

Limited and sectional bipedalism can offering a species several advantages. Bipedalism raises the head; this allows a greater field of vision with improved detection of distant dangers or resources, access to deeper water for wading animals and allows the animals to accomplish higher food sources with their mouths. While upright, non-locomotory limbs become free for other uses, including manipulation (in primates and rodents), flight (in birds), excavation (in giant pangolin), combat (in bears, great apes and the large monitor cadger) or cover-up.

The maximum bipedal speed appears slower than the maximum speed of quadrupedal movement with a flexible backbone – both the ostrich and the red kangaroo tin can reach speeds of 70 km/h (43 mph), while the cheetah can exceed 100 km/h (62 mph).[5] [6] Even though bipedalism is slower at kickoff, over long distances, information technology has allowed humans to outrun most other animals co-ordinate to the endurance running hypothesis.[7] Bipedality in kangaroo rats has been hypothesized to improve locomotor operation,[ clarification needed ] which could aid in escaping from predators.[viii] [9]

Facultative and obligate bipedalism [edit]

Zoologists often characterization behaviors, including bipedalism, equally "facultative" (i.eastward. optional) or "obligate" (the creature has no reasonable culling). Even this stardom is non completely clear-cut — for example, humans other than infants usually walk and run in biped mode, simply most all tin can crawl on easily and knees when necessary. In that location are even reports of humans who normally walk on all fours with their feet but not their knees on the ground, only these cases are a result of weather such as Uner Tan syndrome — very rare genetic neurological disorders rather than normal beliefs.[10] Even if one ignores exceptions caused by some kind of injury or illness, there are many unclear cases, including the fact that "normal" humans tin can clamber on easily and knees. This article therefore avoids the terms "facultative" and "obligate", and focuses on the range of styles of locomotion normally used past various groups of animals. Normal humans may be considered "obligate" bipeds because the alternatives are very uncomfortable and usually simply resorted to when walking is impossible.

Movement [edit]

At that place are a number of states of motion commonly associated with bipedalism.

  1. Standing. Staying notwithstanding on both legs. In most bipeds this is an agile process, requiring constant adjustment of balance.
  2. Walking. One foot in forepart of another, with at least one foot on the ground at any fourth dimension.
  3. Running. Ane foot in front of another, with periods where both feet are off the ground.
  4. Jumping/hopping. Moving past a series of jumps with both anxiety moving together.

Bipedal animals [edit]

The great majority of living terrestrial vertebrates are quadrupeds, with bipedalism exhibited past only a scattering of living groups. Humans, gibbons and large birds walk by raising i foot at a time. On the other hand, most macropods, smaller birds, lemurs and bipedal rodents move by hopping on both legs simultaneously. Tree kangaroos are able to walk or hop, most usually alternating anxiety when moving arboreally and hopping on both feet simultaneously when on the ground.

Extant reptiles [edit]

Many species of lizards become bipedal during high-speed, sprint locomotion, including the globe's fastest lizard, the spiny-tailed iguana (genus Ctenosaura).

Early on reptiles and lizards [edit]

The first known biped is the bolosaurid Eudibamus whose fossils date from 290 million years ago.[eleven] [12] Its long hind-legs, short forelegs, and distinctive joints all suggest bipedalism. The species became extinct in the early Permian.

Archosaurs (includes crocodilians and dinosaurs) [edit]

Birds [edit]

All birds are bipeds when on the ground, a feature inherited from their dinosaur ancestors. All the same, hoatzin chicks have claws on their wings which they apply for climbing.

Other archosaurs [edit]

Bipedalism evolved more than once in archosaurs, the grouping that includes both dinosaurs and crocodilians.[13] All dinosaurs are idea to be descended from a fully bipedal ancestor, perhaps like to Eoraptor. Bipedal movement also re-evolved in a number of other dinosaur lineages such as the iguanodons. Some extinct members of the crocodilian line, a sister group to the dinosaurs, too evolved bipedal forms - a crocodile relative from the triassic, Effigia okeeffeae, is thought to have been bipedal.[xiv] Pterosaurs were previously idea to take been bipedal, just recent trackways have all shown quadrupedal locomotion. Bipedalism likewise evolved independently among the dinosaurs. Dinosaurs diverged from their archosaur ancestors approximately 230 one thousand thousand years ago during the Middle to Late Triassic menstruation, roughly xx million years after the Permian-Triassic extinction result wiped out an estimated 95 percent of all life on Earth.[xv] [16] Radiometric dating of fossils from the early on dinosaur genus Eoraptor establishes its presence in the fossil record at this time. Paleontologists suspect Eoraptor resembles the common antecedent of all dinosaurs;[17] if this is true, its traits advise that the starting time dinosaurs were small, bipedal predators.[eighteen] The discovery of archaic, dinosaur-like ornithodirans such as Marasuchus and Lagerpeton in Argentinian Center Triassic strata supports this view; assay of recovered fossils suggests that these animals were indeed minor, bipedal predators.

Mammals [edit]

A number of groups of extant mammals take independently evolved bipedalism as their principal form of locomotion - for example humans, giant pangolins, the extinct giant ground sloths, numerous species of jumping rodents and macropods. Humans, as their bipedalism has been extensively studied, are documented in the side by side section. Macropods are believed to take evolved bipedal hopping only once in their evolution, at some time no afterwards than 45 million years ago.[nineteen]

Bipedal movement is less mutual among mammals, most of which are quadrupedal. All primates possess some bipedal ability, though most species primarily utilize quadrupedal locomotion on land. Primates bated, the macropods (kangaroos, wallabies and their relatives), kangaroo rats and mice, hopping mice and springhare move bipedally by hopping. Very few mammals other than primates commonly move bipedally by an alternating gait rather than hopping. Exceptions are the ground pangolin and in some circumstances the tree kangaroo.[20] Ane black deport, Pedals, became famous locally and on the internet for having a frequent bipedal gait, although this is attributed to injuries on the deport'south front paws.

Primates [edit]

Most bipedal animals movement with their backs close to horizontal, using a long tail to residual the weight of their bodies. The primate version of bipedalism is unusual because the dorsum is shut to upright (completely upright in humans), and the tail may be absent entirely. Many primates can stand upright on their hind legs without any support. Chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas, gibbons[21] and baboons[22] exhibit forms of bipedalism. On the ground sifakas motion like all indrids with bipedal sideways hopping movements of the hind legs, property their forelimbs up for balance.[23] Geladas, although usually quadrupedal, will sometimes move between side by side feeding patches with a squatting, shuffling bipedal class of locomotion.[24] Nevertheless, they tin but do so for brief amounts, as their bodies are not adapted for abiding bipedal locomotion.

Humans are the only primates who are unremarkably biped, due to an extra curve in the spine which stabilizes the upright position, as well as shorter arms relative to the legs than is the case for the nonhuman keen apes. The evolution of human bipedalism began in primates about 4 million years ago,[25] or as early equally vii meg years agone with Sahelanthropus [26] or about 12 million years ago with Danuvius guggenmosi. I hypothesis for homo bipedalism is that information technology evolved as a result of differentially successful survival from carrying food to share with grouping members,[27] although there are culling hypotheses.

Injured individuals

Injured chimpanzees and bonobos have been capable of sustained bipedalism.[28]

3 captive primates, one macaque Natasha[29] and two chimps, Oliver and Poko (chimpanzee), were plant to move bipedally[ clarification needed ]. Natasha switched to exclusive bipedalism after an illness, while Poko was discovered in captivity in a tall, narrow cage.[30] [31] Oliver reverted to knuckle-walking subsequently developing arthritis. Non-human primates often use bipedal locomotion when carrying food.

Limited bipedalism [edit]

Limited bipedalism in mammals [edit]

Other mammals engage in limited, non-locomotory, bipedalism. A number of other animals, such as rats, raccoons, and beavers volition squat on their hindlegs to manipulate some objects but revert to four limbs when moving (the beaver will motility bipedally if transporting wood for their dams, every bit will the raccoon when holding food). Bears will fight in a bipedal stance to apply their forelegs equally weapons. A number of mammals will adopt a bipedal stance in specific situations such as for feeding or fighting. Ground squirrels and meerkats will stand on hind legs to survey their environment, but will not walk bipedally. Dogs (e.thousand. Faith) tin can stand or move on two legs if trained, or if birth defect or injury precludes quadrupedalism. The gerenuk antelope stands on its hind legs while eating from trees, as did the extinct behemothic footing sloth and chalicotheres. The spotted skunk will walk on its front legs when threatened, rearing up on its front legs while facing the attacker so that its anal glands, capable of spraying an offensive oil, face up its attacker.

Limited bipedalism in non-mammals [edit]

Bipedalism is unknown among the amphibians. Among the non-archosaur reptiles bipedalism is rare, but information technology is institute in the "reared-up" running of lizards such as agamids and monitor lizards. Many reptile species volition as well temporarily adopt bipedalism while fighting.[32] I genus of basilisk lizard tin can run bipedally across the surface of water for some altitude. Amongst arthropods, cockroaches are known to move bipedally at high speeds.[33] Bipedalism is rarely establish outside terrestrial animals, though at least two types of octopus walk bipedally on the sea floor using two of their arms, allowing the remaining arms to be used to camouflage the octopus as a mat of algae or a floating coconut.[34]

Evolution of human bipedalism [edit]

There are at least twelve distinct hypotheses as to how and why bipedalism evolved in humans, and also some debate as to when. Bipedalism evolved well before the large human brain or the development of rock tools.[35] Bipedal specializations are establish in Australopithecus fossils from iv.2 to 3.9 million years ago.[36] Still, the evolution of bipedalism was accompanied past significant evolutions in the spine including the forward movement in position of the foramen magnum, where the spinal string leaves the attic.[37] Recent show regarding modern human sexual dimorphism (concrete differences between male person and female person) in the lumbar spine has been seen in pre-modern primates such as Australopithecus africanus. This dimorphism has been seen as an evolutionary adaptation of females to bear lumbar load better during pregnancy, an adaptation that non-bipedal primates would not need to make.[38] [39] Adapting bipedalism would have required less shoulder stability, which allowed the shoulder and other limbs to get more than independent of each other and adjust for specific suspensory behaviors. In add-on to the change in shoulder stability, irresolute locomotion would take increased the demand for shoulder mobility, which would accept propelled the evolution of bipedalism forward.[40] The different hypotheses are not necessarily mutually exclusive and a number of selective forces may accept acted together to lead to human bipedalism. Information technology is of import to distinguish between adaptations for bipedalism and adaptations for running, which came after still.

The course and function of modernistic-day humans' upper bodies appear to have evolved from living in a more than forested setting. Living in this kind of environment would have made it so that being able to travel arboreally would accept been advantageous at the time. It has as well been proposed that, like some mod-mean solar day apes, early hominins had undergone a knuckle-walking phase prior to adapting the dorsum limbs for bipedality while retaining forearms capable of grasping.[41] Numerous causes for the evolution of human bipedalism involve freeing the easily for carrying and using tools, sexual dimorphism in provisioning, changes in climate and environment (from jungle to savanna) that favored a more elevated eye-position, and to reduce the amount of skin exposed to the tropical sun.[42] It is possible that bipedalism provided a variety of benefits to the hominin species, and scientists have suggested multiple reasons for evolution of human bipedalism.[43] There is also not only the question of why the primeval hominins were partially bipedal but too why hominins became more than bipedal over time. For instance, the postural feeding hypothesis describes how the primeval hominins became bipedal for the benefit of reaching nutrient in trees while the savanna-based theory describes how the belatedly hominins that started to settle on the ground became increasingly bipedal.[44]

Multiple factors [edit]

Napier (1963) argues that it is unlikely that a single gene collection the evolution of bipedalism. He states "It seems unlikely that whatsoever single factor was responsible for such a dramatic change in behaviour. In addition to the advantages of accruing from power to comport objects – food or otherwise – the improvement of the visual range and the freeing of the hands for purposes of defence force and offence may equally have played their part every bit catalysts." [45] Sigmon (1971) demonstrates that chimpanzees exhibit bipedalism in different contexts, and one single gene should be used to explicate bipedalism: preadaptation for human bipedalism.[46] Day (1986) emphasizes 3 major pressures that drove evolution of bipedalism: food acquisition, predator avoidance, and reproductive success.[47] Ko (2015) states at that place are two questions primary regarding bipedalism ane. Why were the earliest hominins partially bipedal? and 2. Why did hominins become more bipedal over fourth dimension? He argues that these questions tin can be answered with combination of prominent theories such as Savanna-based, Postural feeding, and Provisioning.[48]

Savannah-based theory [edit]

According to the Savanna-based theory, hominines came down from the tree's branches and adapted to life on the savanna by walking erect on 2 feet. The theory suggests that early hominids were forced to arrange to bipedal locomotion on the open savanna after they left the trees. I of the proposed mechanisms was the knuckle-walking hypothesis, which states that human ancestors used quadrupedal locomotion on the savanna, as evidenced by morphological characteristics found in Australopithecus anamensis and Australopithecus afarensis forelimbs, and that information technology is less parsimonious to assume that knuckle walking developed twice in genera Pan and Gorilla instead of evolving it once as synapomorphy for Pan and Gorilla before losing it in Australopithecus.[49] The development of an orthograde posture would take been very helpful on a savanna as it would allow the ability to look over tall grasses in order to watch out for predators, or terrestrially hunt and sneak upwardly on prey.[50] It was also suggested in P. East. Wheeler's "The evolution of bipedality and loss of functional body pilus in hominids", that a possible reward of bipedalism in the savanna was reducing the amount of surface area of the body exposed to the lord's day, helping regulate body temperature.[51] In fact, Elizabeth Vrba'due south turnover pulse hypothesis supports the savanna-based theory by explaining the shrinking of forested areas due to global warming and cooling, which forced animals out into the open grasslands and acquired the need for hominids to acquire bipedality.[52]

Others state hominines had already accomplished the bipedal accommodation that was used in the savanna. The fossil evidence reveals that early bipedal hominins were still adapted to climbing trees at the time they were likewise walking upright.[53] It is possible that bipedalism evolved in the trees, and was afterward applied to the savanna every bit a vestigial trait. Humans and orangutans are both unique to a bipedal reactive adaptation when climbing on thin branches, in which they have increased hip and genu extension in relation to the diameter of the co-operative, which can increase an arboreal feeding range and tin exist attributed to a convergent development of bipedalism evolving in arboreal environments.[54] Hominine fossils establish in dry grassland environments led anthropologists to believe hominines lived, slept, walked upright, and died only in those environments because no hominine fossils were found in forested areas. However, fossilization is a rare occurrence—the conditions must be just correct in order for an organism that dies to become fossilized for somebody to notice later, which is also a rare occurrence. The fact that no hominine fossils were found in forests does not ultimately lead to the conclusion that no hominines always died there. The convenience of the savanna-based theory acquired this point to exist overlooked for over a hundred years.[55]

Some of the fossils establish actually showed that there was even so an adaptation to arboreal life. For example, Lucy, the famous Australopithecus afarensis, found in Hadar in Federal democratic republic of ethiopia, which may accept been forested at the fourth dimension of Lucy's death, had curved fingers that would still give her the ability to grasp tree branches, but she walked bipedally. "Little Pes," a nearly-complete specimen of Australopithecus africanus, has a divergent large toe also equally the talocrural joint strength to walk upright. "Little Foot" could grasp things using his anxiety like an ape, perhaps tree branches, and he was bipedal. Ancient pollen establish in the soil in the locations in which these fossils were found suggest that the area used to exist much more wet and covered in thick vegetation and has just recently become the barren desert it is at present.[52]

Traveling efficiency hypothesis [edit]

An alternative explanation is that the mixture of savanna and scattered forests increased terrestrial travel by proto-humans between clusters of copse, and bipedalism offered greater efficiency for long-distance travel between these clusters than quadrupedalism.[56] [57] In an experiment monitoring chimpanzee metabolic rate via oxygen consumption, it was found that the quadrupedal and bipedal energy costs were very similar, implying that this transition in early ape-similar ancestors would non take been very difficult or energetically costing.[58] This increased travel efficiency is likely to have been selected for as it assisted the wide dispersal of early hominids across the savanna to create start populations.

Postural feeding hypothesis [edit]

The postural feeding hypothesis has been recently supported by Dr. Kevin Chase, a professor at Indiana University.[59] This hypothesis asserts that chimpanzees were only bipedal when they eat. While on the basis, they would reach upward for fruit hanging from small trees and while in trees, bipedalism was used to reach up to grab for an overhead branch. These bipedal movements may have evolved into regular habits considering they were so convenient in obtaining food. Also, Hunt'due south hypotheses states that these movements coevolved with chimpanzee arm-hanging, every bit this movement was very effective and efficient in harvesting food. When analyzing fossil beefcake, Australopithecus afarensis has very similar features of the manus and shoulder to the chimpanzee, which indicates hanging arms. Also, the Australopithecus hip and hind limb very conspicuously indicate bipedalism, but these fossils also indicate very inefficient locomotive motion when compared to humans. For this reason, Hunt argues that bipedalism evolved more as a terrestrial feeding posture than as a walking posture.[threescore]

A related study conducted by University of Birmingham, Professor Susannah Thorpe examined the nearly arboreal keen ape, the orangutan, holding onto supporting branches in social club to navigate branches that were besides flexible or unstable otherwise. In more than 75 percent of observations, the orangutans used their forelimbs to stabilize themselves while navigating thinner branches. Increased fragmentation of forests where A. afarensis as well as other ancestors of modern humans and other apes resided could take contributed to this increase of bipedalism in order to navigate the diminishing forests. Findings too could shed light on discrepancies observed in the anatomy of A. afarensis, such as the ankle joint, which allowed information technology to "wobble" and long, highly flexible forelimbs. If bipedalism started from upright navigation in trees, it could explain both increased flexibility in the ankle as well as long forelimbs which grab concur of branches.[61] [62] [63] [64] [65]

Provisioning model [edit]

One theory on the origin of bipedalism is the behavioral model presented by C. Owen Lovejoy, known as "male person provisioning".[66] Lovejoy theorizes that the evolution of bipedalism was linked to monogamy. In the face of long inter-birth intervals and low reproductive rates typical of the apes, early hominids engaged in pair-bonding that enabled greater parental effort directed towards rearing offspring. Lovejoy proposes that male person provisioning of food would improve the offspring survivorship and increase the pair's reproductive charge per unit. Thus the male would leave his mate and offspring to search for nutrient and return carrying the food in his arms walking on his legs. This model is supported past the reduction ("feminization") of the male canine teeth in early on hominids such as Sahelanthropus tchadensis [67] and Ardipithecus ramidus,[68] which along with low trunk size dimorphism in Ardipithecus [69] and Australopithecus,[lxx] suggests a reduction in inter-male antagonistic behavior in early on hominids.[71] In addition, this model is supported by a number of modern man traits associated with concealed ovulation (permanently enlarged breasts, lack of sexual swelling) and low sperm competition (moderate sized testes, low sperm mid-piece volume) that argues against recent adaptation to a polygynous reproductive system.[71]

Notwithstanding, this model has been debated, equally others have argued that early bipedal hominids were instead polygynous. Amidst most monogamous primates, males and females are nigh the same size. That is sexual dimorphism is minimal, and other studies have suggested that Australopithecus afarensis males were nearly twice the weight of females. However, Lovejoy's model posits that the larger range a provisioning male would have to cover (to avoid competing with the female for resources she could achieve herself) would select for increased male body size to limit predation risk.[72] Furthermore, as the species became more than bipedal, specialized feet would prevent the infant from conveniently clinging to the female parent - hampering the mother'southward liberty[73] and thus make her and her offspring more dependent on resource collected past others. Mod monogamous primates such every bit gibbons tend to exist too territorial, simply fossil evidence indicates that Australopithecus afarensis lived in large groups. Nonetheless, while both gibbons and hominids have reduced canine sexual dimorphism, female person gibbons overstate ('masculinize') their canines then they tin actively share in the defense of their dwelling house territory. Instead, the reduction of the male hominid canine is consistent with reduced inter-male assailment in a pair-bonded though group living primate.

Early bipedalism in homininae model [edit]

Recent studies of 4.four one thousand thousand years old Ardipithecus ramidus suggest bipedalism. It is thus possible that bipedalism evolved very early in homininae and was reduced in chimpanzee and gorilla when they became more than specialized. According to Richard Dawkins in his book "The Ancestor'due south Tale", chimps and bonobos are descended from Australopithecus gracile type species while gorillas are descended from Paranthropus. These apes may have once been bipedal, but then lost this ability when they were forced back into an arboreal habitat, presumably by those australopithecines from whom somewhen evolved hominins. Early homininaes such every bit Ardipithecus ramidus may have possessed an arboreal blazon of bipedalism that later independently evolved towards knuckle-walking in chimpanzees and gorillas[74] and towards efficient walking and running in mod humans (run into figure). It is likewise proposed that one crusade of Neanderthal extinction was a less efficient running.

Alarm display (aposematic) model [edit]

Joseph Jordania from the Academy of Melbourne recently (2011) suggested that bipedalism was ane of the cardinal elements of the full general defense strategy of early hominids, based on aposematism, or warning display and intimidation of potential predators and competitors with exaggerated visual and audio signals. According to this model, hominids were trying to stay as visible and as loud every bit possible all the time. Several morphological and behavioral developments were employed to achieve this goal: upright bipedal posture, longer legs, long tightly coiled pilus on the tiptop of the caput, trunk painting, threatening synchronous body movements, loud phonation and extremely loud rhythmic singing/stomping/drumming on external subjects.[75] Slow locomotion and strong body odor (both feature for hominids and humans) are other features ofttimes employed by aposematic species to annunciate their non-profitability for potential predators.

Other behavioural models [edit]

In that location are a diverseness of ideas which promote a specific change in behaviour every bit the central driver for the evolution of hominid bipedalism. For example, Wescott (1967) and later Jablonski & Chaplin (1993) suggest that bipedal threat displays could have been the transitional behaviour which led to some groups of apes beginning to adopt bipedal postures more often. Others (due east.g. Dart 1925) have offered the idea that the need for more than vigilance against predators could accept provided the initial motivation. Dawkins (e.g. 2004) has argued that it could have begun equally a kind of fashion that but caught on and so escalated through sexual choice. And it has even been suggested (e.one thousand. Tanner 1981:165) that male phallic display could take been the initial incentive, as well every bit increased sexual signaling in upright female person posture.[50]

Thermoregulatory model [edit]

The thermoregulatory model explaining the origin of bipedalism is one of the simplest theories then far advanced, but information technology is a viable caption. Dr. Peter Wheeler, a professor of evolutionary biology, proposes that bipedalism raises the corporeality of torso surface area college above the footing which results in a reduction in heat gain and helps heat dissipation.[76] [77] [78] When a hominid is higher to a higher place the ground, the organism accesses more than favorable wind speeds and temperatures. During rut seasons, greater wind flow results in a college estrus loss, which makes the organism more comfortable. Also, Wheeler explains that a vertical posture minimizes the straight exposure to the sun whereas quadrupedalism exposes more of the body to direct exposure. Analysis and interpretations of Ardipithecus reveal that this hypothesis needs modification to consider that the forest and woodland environmental preadaptation of early-phase hominid bipedalism preceded further refinement of bipedalism past the pressure of natural pick. This then allowed for the more than efficient exploitation of the hotter weather condition ecological niche, rather than the hotter conditions existence hypothetically bipedalism's initial stimulus. A feedback machinery from the advantages of bipedality in hot and open habitats would then in turn brand a forest preadaptation solidify as a permanent land.[79]

Carrying models [edit]

Charles Darwin wrote that "Man could not have attained his present dominant position in the earth without the use of his hands, which are so admirably adapted to the act of obedience of his will". Darwin (1871:52) and many models on bipedal origins are based on this line of thought. Gordon Hewes (1961) suggested that the carrying of meat "over considerable distances" (Hewes 1961:689) was the central factor. Isaac (1978) and Sinclair et al. (1986) offered modifications of this idea, as indeed did Lovejoy (1981) with his "provisioning model" described higher up. Others, such as Nancy Tanner (1981), have suggested that baby carrying was key, while others again take suggested stone tools and weapons drove the alter.[80] This rock-tools theory is very unlikely, as though aboriginal humans were known to hunt, the discovery of tools was not discovered for thousands of years later on the origin of bipedalism, chronologically precluding it from being a driving force of evolution. (Wooden tools and spears fossilize poorly and therefore information technology is hard to make a judgment about their potential usage.)

Wading models [edit]

The observation that big primates, including especially the great apes, that predominantly move quadrupedally on dry state, tend to switch to bipedal locomotion in waist deep water, has led to the idea that the origin of human bipedalism may have been influenced by waterside environments. This idea, labelled "the wading hypothesis",[81] was originally suggested by the Oxford marine biologist Alister Hardy who said: "It seems to me likely that Man learnt to stand erect showtime in water and then, as his rest improved, he found he became better equipped for standing upwardly on the shore when he came out, and indeed as well for running."[82] It was then promoted past Elaine Morgan, equally part of the aquatic ape hypothesis, who cited bipedalism among a cluster of other man traits unique among primates, including voluntary control of breathing, hairlessness and subcutaneous fat.[83] The "aquatic ape hypothesis", as originally formulated, has not been accepted or considered a serious theory within the anthropological scholarly community.[84] Others, however, take sought to promote wading as a cistron in the origin of human bipedalism without referring to further ("aquatic ape" related) factors. Since 2000 Carsten Niemitz has published a series of papers and a book[85] on a variant of the wading hypothesis, which he calls the "amphibian generalist theory" (German: Amphibische Generalistentheorie).

Other theories have been proposed that suggest wading and the exploitation of aquatic food sources (providing essential nutrients for human brain development[86] or critical fallback foods[87]) may have exerted evolutionary pressures on man ancestors promoting adaptations which later assisted total-fourth dimension bipedalism. It has also been thought that consistent h2o-based nutrient sources had developed early hominid dependency and facilitated dispersal forth seas and rivers.[88]

Consequences [edit]

Prehistoric fossil records show that early hominins commencement adult bipedalism before being followed by an increase in brain size.[89] The consequences of these two changes in item resulted in painful and difficult labor due to the increased favor of a narrow pelvis for bipedalism being countered by larger heads passing through the constricted birth culvert. This phenomenon is ordinarily known every bit the obstetrical dilemma.

Non-human being primates habitually deliver their young on their ain, merely the same cannot be said for modern-day humans. Isolated birth appears to be rare and actively avoided cross-culturally, even if birthing methods may differ between said cultures. This is due to the fact that the narrowing of the hips and the alter in the pelvic bending caused a discrepancy in the ratio of the size of the head to the birth canal. The result of this is that there is greater difficulty in birthing for hominins in full general, allow alone to be doing information technology by oneself.[90]

Physiology [edit]

Bipedal movement occurs in a number of ways and requires many mechanical and neurological adaptations. Some of these are described beneath.

Biomechanics [edit]

Continuing [edit]

Energy-efficient means of standing bipedally involve abiding adjustment of balance, and of form these must avoid overcorrection. The difficulties associated with simple standing in upright humans are highlighted by the greatly increased chance of falling present in the elderly, even with minimal reductions in control system effectiveness.

Shoulder stability [edit]

Shoulder stability would decrease with the evolution of bipedalism. Shoulder mobility would increase because the need for a stable shoulder is only present in arboreal habitats. Shoulder mobility would back up suspensory locomotion behaviors which are present in human bipedalism. The forelimbs are freed from weight-bearing requirements, which makes the shoulder a place of evidence for the evolution of bipedalism.[91]

Walking [edit]

Contour view of the human spine

Different non-human apes that are able to practice bipedality such as Pan and Gorilla, hominins have the ability to movement bipedally without the utilization of a aptitude-hip-bent-knee (BHBK) gait, which requires the engagement of both the hip and the articulatio genus joints. This homo power to walk is made possible by the spinal curvature humans have that non-human being apes exercise not.[92] Rather, walking is characterized by an "inverted pendulum" movement in which the middle of gravity vaults over a stiff leg with each step.[93] Force plates tin be used to quantify the whole-torso kinetic & potential energy, with walking displaying an out-of-phase human relationship indicating exchange between the ii.[93] This model applies to all walking organisms regardless of the number of legs, and thus bipedal locomotion does not differ in terms of whole-torso kinetics.[94]

In humans, walking is composed of several split up processes:[93]

  • Vaulting over a strong stance leg
  • Passive ballistic motion of the swing leg
  • A brusk 'push' from the ankle prior to toe-off, propelling the swing leg
  • Rotation of the hips about the axis of the spine, to increase stride length
  • Rotation of the hips about the horizontal axis to improve remainder during stance

Running [edit]

A grouping of children racing

Early hominins underwent post-cranial changes in society to ameliorate adapt to bipedality, specially running. I of these changes is having longer hindlimbs proportional to the forelimbs and their effects. Equally previously mentioned, longer hindlimbs assist in thermoregulation past reducing the total surface area exposed to straight sunlight while simultaneously allowing for more than infinite for cooling winds. Additionally, having longer limbs is more than free energy-efficient, since longer limbs mean that overall muscle strain is lessened. Amend energy efficiency, in turn, means higher endurance, particularly when running long distances.[95]

Running is characterized by a spring-mass movement.[93] Kinetic and potential free energy are in phase, and the energy is stored & released from a jump-like limb during foot contact,[93] achieved by the plantar arch and the Achilles tendon in the foot and leg, respectively.[95] Over again, the whole-body kinetics are similar to animals with more limbs.[94]

Musculature [edit]

Bipedalism requires strong leg muscles, particularly in the thighs. Contrast in domesticated poultry the well muscled legs, against the small and bony wings. Likewise in humans, the quadriceps and hamstring muscles of the thigh are both then crucial to bipedal activities that each alone is much larger than the well-developed biceps of the arms. In addition to the leg muscles, the increased size of the gluteus maximus in humans is an important adaptation as it provides support and stability to the torso and lessens the corporeality of stress on the joints when running.[95]

Respiration [edit]

The human respiratory organisation, encased by the rib cage

Quadrupeds, unlike bipeds, cannot respire while moving. This is due to the fact that the touch of propelling themselves autumn on their forelimbs. The closeness of the chest to the points of impact means that their organs would hit one another, which is non sustainable for running. Thus, they are merely able to run in short bursts before having to rest. Humans, on the other, do not take that limitation. Due to the use of bipedality for locomotion, the impact of running or walking does not travel far plenty to jar the organs in the chest cavity.[96] A biped has the ability to breathe while running, without strong coupling to stride wheel. Humans usually have a breath every other footstep when their aerobic system is performance. During a dart the anaerobic arrangement kicks in and breathing slows until the anaerobic arrangement can no longer sustain a dart.

Respiration through bipedality ways that at that place is better jiff control in bipeds, which can be associated with brain growth. The mod encephalon utilizes approximately 20% of energy input gained through breathing and eating, equally opposed to species like chimpanzees who apply up twice as much free energy every bit humans for the same amount of motility. This excess energy, leading to encephalon growth, as well leads to the development of verbal communication. This is because jiff control means that the muscles associated with breathing tin be manipulated into creating sounds. This means that the onset of bipedality, leading to more efficient breathing, is the source of verbal language.[96]

Bipedal robots [edit]

For nearly the whole of the 20th century, bipedal robots were very difficult to construct and robot locomotion involved merely wheels, treads, or multiple legs. Recent cheap and compact computing power has made two-legged robots more feasible. Some notable biped robots are ASIMO, HUBO, MABEL and QRIO. Recently, spurred by the success of creating a fully passive, un-powered bipedal walking robot,[97] those working on such machines have begun using principles gleaned from the study of human and animal locomotion, which often relies on passive mechanisms to minimize power consumption.

See also [edit]

  • Allometry
  • Orthograde posture
  • Quadrupedalism

Notes [edit]

  1. ^ The cherry kangaroo tin attain a similar speed for short distances.[3]

References [edit]

  1. ^ Stewart, D. (2006-08-01). "A Bird Similar No Other". National Wild animals. National Wildlife Federation. Archived from the original on 2012-02-09. Retrieved 2014-05-30 .
  2. ^ Davies, S.J.J.F. (2003). "Birds I Tinamous and Ratites to Hoatzins". In Hutchins, Michael (ed.). Grzimek's Animal Life Encyclopedia. Vol. 8 (2nd ed.). Farmington Hills, MI: Gale Group. pp. 99–101. ISBN978-0-7876-5784-0.
  3. ^ Penny, M. (2002). The Secret World of Kangaroos. Austin, TX: Raintree Steck-Vaughn. p. 22. ISBN978-0-7398-4986-half-dozen.
  4. ^ Heglund, NC; Cavagna, GA; Taylor, CR (1982). "Energetics and mechanics of terrestrial locomotion. III. Energy changes of the centre of mass as a function of speed and body size in birds and mammals". Journal of Experimental Biology. 97: 41–56. doi:x.1242/jeb.97.ane.41. PMID 7086349.
  5. ^ Garland, T. Jr. (1983). "The relation between maximal running speed and body mass in terrestrial mammals" (PDF). Periodical of Zoology, London. 199 (2): 157–170. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1983.tb02087.x. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2018-08-31. Retrieved 2010-04-11 .
  6. ^ Precipitous, North.C.C. (1997). "Timed running speed of a cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus)". Journal of Zoology. 241 (three): 493–494. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1997.tb04840.ten.
  7. ^ Brier, Dennis M.; Lieberman, Daniel E. (2004-11-eighteen). "Endurance running and the evolution of Human". Nature. 432 (7015): 345–352. Bibcode:2004Natur.432..345B. doi:10.1038/nature03052. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 15549097. S2CID 2470602.
  8. ^ Djawdan, M (1993). "Locomotor performance of bipedal and quadrupedal heteromyid rodents". Functional Ecology. 7 (2): 195–202. doi:10.2307/2389887. JSTOR 2389887.
  9. ^ Djawdan, Thou.; Garland, T. Jr. (1988). "Maximal running speeds of bipedal and quadrupedal rodents" (PDF). Journal of Mammalogy. 69 (4): 765–772. doi:x.2307/1381631. JSTOR 1381631. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2010-06-16.
  10. ^ Humphrey, N.; Skoyles, J.R.; Keynes, R. (2005). "Human Hand-Walkers: V Siblings Who Never Stood Upward" (PDF). Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Scientific discipline, London School of Economics. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2008-09-10.
  11. ^ "Upright lizard leaves dinosaur continuing". cnn.com. 2000-eleven-03. Archived from the original on 2007-10-31. Retrieved 2007-x-17 .
  12. ^ Berman, David Due south.; et al. (2000). "Early on Permian Bipedal Reptile". Scientific discipline. 290 (5493): 969–972. Bibcode:2000Sci...290..969B. doi:x.1126/science.290.5493.969. PMID 11062126.
  13. ^ Hutchinson, J. R. (2006). "The development of locomotion in archosaurs". Comptes Rendus Palevol. 5 (iii–four): 519–530. doi:10.1016/j.crpv.2005.09.002.
  14. ^ Handwerk, Brian (2006-01-26). "Dino-Era Fossil Reveals Two-Footed Croc Relative". National Geographic. Archived from the original on 2007-x-31. Retrieved 2007-10-29 .
  15. ^ Citation for Permian/Triassic extinction event, per centum of animal species that went extinct. Run across commentary Archived 2011-06-05 at the Wayback Machine
  16. ^ Another citation for P/T event data. See commentary Archived 2012-09-01 at the Wayback Auto
  17. ^ Hayward, T. (1997). The Get-go Dinosaurs. Dinosaur Cards. Orbis Publishing Ltd. D36040612.
  18. ^ Sereno, Paul C.; Catherine A. Forster; Raymond R. Rogers; Alfredo M. Monetta (January 1993). "Primitive dinosaur skeleton from Argentina and the early evolution of Dinosauria". Nature. 361 (6407): 64–66. Bibcode:1993Natur.361...64S. doi:ten.1038/361064a0. S2CID 4270484.
  19. ^ Burk, Angela; Michael Westerman; Mark Springer (September 1988). "The Phylogenetic Position of the Musky Rat-Kangaroo and the Evolution of Bipedal Hopping in Kangaroos (Macropodidae: Diprotodontia)". Systematic Biological science. 47 (3): 457–474. doi:ten.1080/106351598260824. PMID 12066687.
  20. ^ Prideaux, Gavin J.; Warburton, Natalie M. (2008). "A new Pleistocene tree-kangaroo (Diprotodontia: Macropodidae) from the Nullarbor Evidently of south-central Australia". Periodical of Vertebrate Paleontology. 28 (2): 463–478. doi:ten.1671/0272-4634(2008)28[463:ANPTDM]ii.0.CO;2. S2CID 84129882. Archived from the original on 2011-10-19. Retrieved 2011-10-18 .
  21. ^ Aerts, Peter; Evie E. Vereeckea; Kristiaan D'Aoûta (2006). "Locomotor versatility in the white-handed gibbon (Hylobates lar): A spatiotemporal analysis of the bipedal, tripedal, and quadrupedal gaits". Journal of Human Evolution. 50 (5): 552–567. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2005.12.011. PMID 16516949.
  22. ^ Rose, M.D. (1976). "Bipedal behavior of olive baboons (Papio anubis) and its relevance to an understanding of the evolution of homo bipedalism". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 44 (two): 247–261. doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330440207. PMID 816205. Archived from the original on 2013-01-05.
  23. ^ "Coquerel'due south Sifaka". Duke University Lemur Center. Archived from the original on 2013-09-23. Retrieved 2009-06-xv .
  24. ^ "Primate Factsheets: Gelada baboon (Theropithecus gelada) Taxonomy, Morphology, & Ecology". Archived from the original on 2012-05-09. Retrieved 2012-07-23 .
  25. ^ Kondō, Shirō (1985). Primate morphophysiology, locomotor analyses, and human being bipedalism. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press. ISBN978-4-13-066093-8. [ page needed ]
  26. ^ Staff (August 14, 2016). "What Does It Mean To Be Man? - Walking Upright". Smithsonian Institution. Archived from the original on Baronial eighteen, 2016. Retrieved August fourteen, 2016.
  27. ^ Videan, Elaine North.; McGrew, W.C. (2002-05-09). "Bipedality in chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and bonobo (Pan paniscus): Testing hypotheses on the evolution of bipedalism". American Periodical of Physical Anthropology. 118 (two): 184–190. doi:ten.1002/ajpa.10058. PMID 12012370. Archived from the original on 2013-01-05. Retrieved 2013-04-30 .
  28. ^ Bauer, Harold (1976). "Chimpanzee bipedal locomotion in the Gombe National Park, E Africa". Primates. xviii (4): 913–921. doi:10.1007/BF02382940. S2CID 41892278.
  29. ^ Waldman, Dan (2004-07-21). "Monkey apes humans by walking on two legs". NBC News . Retrieved 2007-10-29 .
  30. ^ "University of Liverpool - Research Intelligence Effect 22 - Walking tall later on all". Liv.ac.uk. Archived from the original on 2012-12-15. Retrieved 2013-04-30 .
  31. ^ Tetrapod Zoology : Bipedal orangs, gait of a dinosaur, and new-expect Ichthyostega: exciting times in functional beefcake part I Archived May 8, 2012, at the Wayback Machine
  32. ^ Sharma, Jayanth (2007-03-08). "The Story behind the Picture show - Monitor Lizards Combat". Wildlife Times. Archived from the original (php) on 2007-10-30. Retrieved 2007-10-29 .
  33. ^ "Bipedal animals, and their differences from humans". Ingentaconnect.com. 2004-05-01. Archived from the original on 2012-eleven-26. Retrieved 2013-04-30 .
  34. ^ Huffard CL, Boneka F, Full RJ (2005). "Underwater bipedal locomotion by octopuses in disguise". Science. 307 (5717): 1927. doi:10.1126/science.1109616. PMID 15790846. S2CID 21030132.
  35. ^ Lovejoy, C.O. (1988). "Evolution of Homo walking". Scientific American. 259 (5): 82–89. Bibcode:1988SciAm.259e.118L. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1188-118. PMID 3212438.
  36. ^ McHenry, H. M. (2009). "Man Development". In Michael Ruse; Joseph Travis (eds.). Development: The Starting time Four Billion Years. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Printing. p. 263. ISBN978-0-674-03175-3.
  37. ^ Wayman, Erin (August vi, 2012). "Becoming Man: The Development of Walking Upright". smithsonian.com. Archived from the original on October 3, 2014.
  38. ^ The Independent's article A pregnant woman's spine is her flexible friend Archived 2007-12-15 at the Wayback Automobile, past Steve Connor from The Independent (Published: 13 December 2007) quoting Whitcome, KK; Shapiro, LJ; Lieberman, DE (December 2007). "Fetal load and the evolution of lumbar lordosis in bipedal hominins". Nature. 450 (7172): 1075–1078. Bibcode:2007Natur.450.1075W. doi:10.1038/nature06342. PMID 18075592. S2CID 10158.
  39. ^ Why Pregnant Women Don't Tip Over. Archived 2007-12-13 at Wikiwix Amitabh Avasthi for National Geographic News, December 12, 2007. This article has skillful pictures explaining the differences between bipedal and non-bipedal pregnancy loads.
  40. ^ Sylvester, Adam D. (2006). "Locomotor Coupling and the Origin of Hominin Bipedalism". Journal of Theoretical Biology. 242 (3): 581–590. Bibcode:2006JThBi.242..581S. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.04.016. PMID 16782133.
  41. ^ Thorpe, S. K. S.; Holder, R. L.; Crompton, R. H. (2007). "Origin of Human Bipedalism as an Adaptation for Locomotion on Flexible Branches". Science. 316 (5829): 1328–1331. Bibcode:2007Sci...316.1328T. doi:ten.1126/scientific discipline.1140799. ISSN 0036-8075. JSTOR 20036393. PMID 17540902. S2CID 85992565.
  42. ^ Niemitz, Carsten (2010). "The evolution of the upright posture and gait—a review and a new synthesis". Naturwissenschaften. 97 (iii): 241–263. Bibcode:2010NW.....97..241N. doi:10.1007/s00114-009-0637-three. PMC2819487. PMID 20127307.
  43. ^ Sigmon, Becky (1971). "Bipedal behavior and the emergence of erect posture in man". American Periodical of Physical Anthropology. 34 (1): 55–60. doi:ten.1002/ajpa.1330340105. PMID 4993117.
  44. ^ Ko, Kwang Hyun (2015). "Origins of Bipedalism". Brazilian Archives of Biology and Engineering science. 58 (six): 929–934. arXiv:1508.02739. Bibcode:2015arXiv150802739K. doi:10.1590/S1516-89132015060399. S2CID 761213.
  45. ^ Napier, JR (1964). The development of bipedal walking in the hominids. Archives de Biologie (Liege).
  46. ^ Sigmon, Becky (1971). "Bipedal behavior and the emergence of erect posture in human". American Periodical of Concrete Anthropology. 58 (6): 929–934. arXiv:1508.02739. Bibcode:2015arXiv150802739K. doi:10.1590/S1516-89132015060399. PMID 4993117. S2CID 761213.
  47. ^ Twenty-four hours, MH (1986). Bipedalism: Pressures, origins and modes. Major topics in man evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  48. ^ Kwang Hyun, Ko (2015). "Origins of Bipedalism". Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology. 58 (half dozen): 929–934. arXiv:1508.02739. Bibcode:2015arXiv150802739K. doi:10.1590/S1516-89132015060399. S2CID 761213.
  49. ^ Richmond, B. 1000.; Strait, D. S. (2000). "Evidence that humans evolved from a knuckle-walking ancestor". Nature. 404 (6776): 382–385. Bibcode:2000Natur.404..382R. doi:10.1038/35006045. PMID 10746723. S2CID 4303978.
  50. ^ a b Dean, F. 2000. Primate diversity. Due west.West. Norton & Company, Inc: New York. Print.
  51. ^ Wheeler, P. Eastward. (1984). "The Evolution of Bipedality and Loss of Functional Trunk Hair in Hominoids". Journal of Human Evolution. 13: 91–98. doi:x.1016/s0047-2484(84)80079-two.
  52. ^ a b Shreeve, James, "Sunset on the savanna" Archived 2017-09-28 at the Wayback Machine, Discover, 1996.
  53. ^ Green, Alemseged, David, Zeresenay (2012). "Australopithecus afarensis Scapular Ontogeny, Function, and the Role of Climbing in Human Evolution". Science. 338 (6106): 514–517. Bibcode:2012Sci...338..514G. doi:x.1126/science.1227123. PMID 23112331. S2CID 206543814.
  54. ^ Thorpe, Southward. K.; Holder, R. Fifty.; Crompton, R. H. (2007). "Origin of human bipedalism every bit an adaptation for locomotion on flexible branches". Science. 316 (5829): 1328–31. Bibcode:2007Sci...316.1328T. doi:x.1126/science.1140799. PMID 17540902. S2CID 85992565.
  55. ^ Shreeve, James (1996). "Sunset on the savanna". Detect. Archived from the original on 2017-09-28.
  56. ^ Isbell, L. A. & T. P. Young. (1996). "The evolution of bipedalism in hominids and reduced grouping size in chimpanzees: culling responses to decreasing resource availability". Journal of Man Evolution. xxx (5): 389–397. doi:ten.1006/jhev.1996.0034.
  57. ^ Lewin, Roger; Swisher, Carl Celso; Curtis, Garniss H. (2000). Java man: how two geologists' dramatic discoveries inverse our understanding of the evolutionary path to modernistic humans. New York: Scribner. ISBN978-0-684-80000-4.
  58. ^ Pontzer, H.; Raichlen, D. A.; Rodman, P. Southward. (2014). "Bipedal and quadrupedal locomotion in chimpanzees". Periodical of Human Development. 66: 64–82. doi:ten.1016/j.jhevol.2013.10.002. PMID 24315239.
  59. ^ Hunt 1996, pp. 77–90.
  60. ^ Hunt 1996.
  61. ^ Gibbons, Ann (31 May 2007). "Walk Similar an Orangutan: Ape's stroll through the copse may shed light on evolution of man bipedalism". Science Magazine.
  62. ^ Minkel, JR (31 May 2007). "Orangutans Show First Walking May Have Been on Copse". Scientific American.
  63. ^ Kaplan, Matt (31 May 2007). "Upright orangutans point manner to walking". Nature Magazine.
  64. ^ Hooper, Rowan (31 May 2007). "Our upright walking started in the trees". New Scientist Mag.
  65. ^ Thorpe, Susannah (2007). "Walking the walk: evolution of human bipedalism" (PDF). University of Birmingham.
  66. ^ T. Douglas Price; Gary M. Feinman (2003). Images of the Past, fifth edition. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill. p. 68. ISBN978-0-07-340520-nine.
  67. ^ Brunet, Michel; Guy F; Pilbeam D; Mackaye HT; Likius A; et al. (11 July 2002). "A new hominid from the Upper Miocene of Chad, Central Africa". Nature. 418 (6894): 145–151. Bibcode:2002Natur.418..145B. doi:10.1038/nature00879. PMID 12110880. S2CID 1316969.
  68. ^ Suwa, Gen; Kono RT; Simpson SW; Asfaw B; Lovejoy CO; White TD (ii October 2009). "Paleobiological implications of the Ardipithecus ramidus dentition" (PDF). Science. 326 (5949): 94–99. Bibcode:2009Sci...326...94S. doi:x.1126/science.1175824. PMID 19810195. S2CID 3744438.
  69. ^ White TD et al. Science. 2009 326(5949):75-86
  70. ^ Reno PL et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 365(1556):3355-63; Harmon E. J Hum Evol. 2009 56(6):551-ix; Reno PL and Lovejoy CO. PeerJ. 2015. 3:e925 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.925
  71. ^ a b Lovejoy CO. Science. 2009 326(5949):74e1-8.
  72. ^ Lovejoy CO. Science. 1981 211(4480):341-50.
  73. ^ Keith Oatley, Dacher Keltner, Jennifer G. Jenkins. Understanding Emotion (2006) Second Edition. Folio 235.
  74. ^ Kivell TL, Schmitt D (August 2009). "Independent evolution of knuckle-walking in African apes shows that humans did not evolve from a knuckle-walking ancestor". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.s.A. 106 (34): 14241–half-dozen. Bibcode:2009PNAS..10614241K. doi:10.1073/pnas.0901280106. PMC2732797. PMID 19667206.
  75. ^ Joseph Jordania. Why do People Sing? Music in Man Evolution. Logos, 2011
  76. ^ Wheeler, P. Eastward. (1984). "The development of bipedality and loss of functional body hair in hominids". J. Hum. Evol. 13: 91–98. doi:x.1016/s0047-2484(84)80079-2.
  77. ^ Wheeler, P. E. (1990). "The influence of thermoregulatory option pressures on hominid evolution". Behav. Brain Sci. 13 (2): 366. doi:10.1017/s0140525x00079218. S2CID 147314740.
  78. ^ Wheeler, P.E. (1991). "The influence of bipedalism on the free energy and h2o budgets of early on hominids". J. Hum. Evol. 21 (2): 117–136. doi:10.1016/0047-2484(91)90003-e.
  79. ^ David-Barrett, T.; Dunbar, R. (2016). "Bipedality and pilus loss in human being evolution revisited: The affect of altitude and activity scheduling". J. Hum. Evol. 94: 72–82. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2016.02.006. PMC4874949. PMID 27178459.
  80. ^ Tanner, Nancy Makepeace "On Condign Man" Archived 2013-05-22 at the Wayback Machine Cambridge: Cambridge Academy Press, 1981
  81. ^ Kuliukas, A. (2013). "Wading Hypotheses of the Origin of Human Bipedalism". Human Evolution. 28 (3–4): 213–236.
  82. ^ Hardy, Alister C. (1960). "Was human being more aquatic in the past?" (PDF). New Scientist. 7 (174): 642–645. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 March 2009.
  83. ^ Morgan, Elaine (1997). The Aquatic Ape Hypothesis. Gift Press. ISBN978-0-285-63518-0.
  84. ^ Meier, R (2003). The complete idiot'due south guide to human prehistory. Alpha Books. pp. 57–59. ISBN978-0-02-864421-9.
  85. ^ Niemitz, Carsten (2004). Das Geheimnis des Aufrechten Gangs ~ Unsere Evolution Verlief Anders. Beck. ISBN978-3-406-51606-1.
  86. ^ Cunnane, Stephen C (2005). Survival of the fattest: the key to human encephalon development. Earth Scientific Publishing Company. pp. 259. ISBN978-981-256-191-6.
  87. ^ Wrangham R, Cheney D, Seyfarth R, Sarmiento E (December 2009). "Shallow-water habitats every bit sources of fallback foods for hominins". Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 140 (iv): 630–42. doi:10.1002/ajpa.21122. PMID 19890871.
  88. ^ {Verhaegena, 1000., P. F. Puechb, South. Munro. 2002. Aquaboreal ancestors? Trends in Evolution and Ecology: 212 – 217.}
  89. ^ DeSilva, Jeremy (2021). Beginning Steps: How Upright Walking Made Us Human. HarperCollins. p. 17. ISBN978-0062938497.
  90. ^ Trevathan, Wenda R. (1996). "The Evolution of Bipedalism and Assisted Nativity". Medical Anthropology Quarterly. 10 (2): 287–290. doi:ten.1525/maq.1996.x.2.02a00100. ISSN 0745-5194. JSTOR 649332. PMID 8744088.
  91. ^ Sylvester, Adam D. (2006). "Locomotor Coupling and the Origin of Hominin Bipedalism". Journal of Theoretical Biology. 242 (3): 581–590. Bibcode:2006JThBi.242..581S. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.04.016. PMID 16782133.
  92. ^ Lovejoy, C. Owen; McCollum, Melanie A. (2010). "Spinopelvic pathways to bipedality: why no hominids ever relied on a bent-hip-bent-knee joint gait". Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences. 365 (1556): 3289–3299. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0112. ISSN 0962-8436. JSTOR 20778968. PMC2981964. PMID 20855303.
  93. ^ a b c d e McMahon, Thomas A. (1984). Muscles, reflexes, and locomotion. ISBN978-0-691-02376-2.
  94. ^ a b Biewener, Andrew A.; Daniel, T. (2003). A moving topic: control and dynamics of animal locomotion. Biology Letters. Vol. half dozen. pp. 387–8. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2010.0294. ISBN978-0-nineteen-850022-3. PMC2880073. PMID 20410030.
  95. ^ a b c Pontzer, Herman (2012). "Ecological Energetics in Early Homo". Current Anthropology. 53 (S6): S346–S358. doi:10.1086/667402. ISSN 0011-3204. JSTOR 10.1086/667402. S2CID 31461168.
  96. ^ a b DeSilva, Jeremy (2021). Kickoff Steps: How Upright Walking Made Us Human. New York: Harper Collins.
  97. ^ "Passive Dynamic Walking at Cornell". Ruina.tam.cornell.edu. Archived from the original on 2013-11-07. Retrieved 2013-04-xxx .

Sources [edit]

  • Hunt, Kevin (1996). "The postural feeding hypothesis: an ecological model for the evolution of bipedalism". Due south African Periodical of Science. 92 (February 1996): 77–90. Archived from the original on 2017-03-05. {{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: ref duplicates default (link)

Further reading [edit]

  • Darwin, C., "The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex", Murray (London), (1871).
  • Dart, R. A., "Australopithecus africanus: The Ape Man of South Africa" Nature, 145, 195–199, (1925).
  • Dawkins, R., "The Ancestor's Tale", Weidenfeld and Nicolson (London), (2004).
  • DeSilva, J., "First Steps: How Upright Walking Made Us Homo" HarperCollins (New York), (2021)
  • Hewes, G. Westward., "Food Transport and the Origin of Hominid Bipedalism" American Anthropologist, 63, 687–710, (1961).
  • Hunt, K. D., "The Development of Human Bipedality" Periodical of Human Evolution, 26, 183–202, (1994).
  • Isaac, One thousand. I., "The Archeological Evidence for the Activities of Early African Hominids" In:Early Hominids of Africa (Jolly, C.J. (Ed.)), Duckworth (London), 219–254, (1978).
  • Jablonski, N.G.; Chaplin, G. (1993). "Origin of Habitual Terrestrial Bipedalism in the Ancestor of the Hominidae". Journal of Human Evolution. 24 (4): 259–280. doi:10.1006/jhev.1993.1021.
  • Lovejoy, C. O. (1981). "The Origin of Human". Science. 211 (4480): 341–350. Bibcode:1981Sci...211..341L. doi:10.1126/scientific discipline.211.4480.341. PMID 17748254.
  • Tanner, N. M., "On Becoming Human", Cambridge Academy Printing (Cambridge), (1981)
  • Wescott, R.W. (1967). "Hominid Uprightness and Primate Display". American Anthropologist. 69 (6): 738. doi:10.1525/aa.1967.69.half-dozen.02a00110.
  • Wheeler, P. E. (1984) "The Evolution of Bipedality and Loss of Functional Body Hair in Hominoids." Journal of Human Evolution, 13, 91–98,
  • Vrba, Due east. (1993). "The Pulse that Produced United states of america". Natural History. 102 (5): 47–51.

External links [edit]

  • The Origin of Bipedalism
  • Human Timeline (Interactive) – Smithsonian, National Museum of Natural History (August 2016)

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bipedalism

Posted by: merrymanblene1972.blogspot.com

0 Response to "What Animals Can You See At Sunset Savanna"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel